Skip page navigation

Eric D. Snider

· website | e-mail | twitter

Eric has been a film critic since 1999, and a beard wearer since 2008. He holds a degree in journalism and used to work in "the newspaper industry," back when that was a thing.

Review: Silent House Gives Goosebumps

B+

Practically a master class in how to tell a spooky-house story.

There are no original ideas in Silent House and not just because it’s a remake. The 2010 Uruguayan film that spawned it, barely seen outside the festival circuit, is reportedly composed of familiar ingredients, too. But so are the scary stories that you tell around campfires, and plenty of those get the job done, their simplicity notwithstanding. It’s all in the execution.

Silent House is executed with unnerving skill, practically a master class in how to tell a spooky-house story. Start with a vulnerable female; put her in a large, rural house with creepy noises; keep daylight to a minimum; let the pants-wetting ensue. Directors Chris Kentis and Laura Lau — the husband-and-wife duo who made Open Water — don’t reinvent the horror game, but they play it very well.

The story is told in real time, and even appears to have been shot in one continuous, unbroken take. (It probably wasn’t.) At the center of nearly every frame is Sarah (Elizabeth Olsen), a young woman who spent her childhood summers at this charming old house in the woods. Now suffering from the ravages of age and vandalism, the house is being prepped for sale by Sarah’s father (Adam Trese) and uncle Peter (Eric Sheffer Stevens). Sarah is on hand to help with the repairs.

Unexplained sounds emanate from upstairs. The house is big and has been unoccupied for years; it could be anything from raccoons to squatters. Sophia (Julia Taylor Ross), a young woman who lives nearby and played with Sarah when they were both little, stops over to say hello, but Sarah isn’t sure she remembers her. Sarah’s father is demanding, her uncle vaguely inappropriate, the general atmosphere slightly puzzling.

From these simple ingredients comes a hair-raising, armrest-clutching, close-the-closet-door-before-you-go-to-sleep suspense thriller. By shooting the film in one long take (or at least appearing to do so) and focusing on one character, the directors achieve a greater degree of intimacy — a greater sense of “you are there” — than a traditional structure would allow. (The Uruguayan film, by Gustavo Hernandez, used the same technique, though I’m told there are significant differences in the plot.) Kentis and Lau use the naturalistic setting to their advantage. When Sarah walks into a dimly lit room, for example, it takes us as long to make out the shapes as it does her. We don’t know anything that she doesn’t.

Elizabeth Olsen, the heretofore-unknown younger sister of Mary-Kate and Ashley, handles the daunting task of carrying an entire scary movie on her shoulders with impressive skill. She is called upon to do a lot of crying, screaming, and cowering, and while the story has her hiding under tables and beds a few too many times, she is never less than convincing. Sarah is the quintessential heroine for this type of movie: vulnerable but not weak, strong but still feminine.

The actors who play Sarah’s father and uncle aren’t nearly as good, resulting in a few unintentionally funny moments. (I note that the acting was the major problem with Open Water, too.) It’s also possible that Kentis and Lau employ too many “jump scares,” and that the ominous musical score is overused.

I’m also disappointed by the film’s usage of the old “This really happened on such-and-such a date!” framing device. This isn’t a true story; no one believes you when you say it is; insulting our intelligence doesn’t make the film any scarier.

But I’m in awe of the directors’ ability to pull off the single-take trick. Even assuming that it was actually three or four separate shots, each one is full of movement and activity, taking place on three levels of a real house; the logistics alone set a movie nerd’s heart a-flutter. There are several nifty sleight-of-hand tricks that could only have been done live, without post-production assistance. Any weaknesses in the film are more than outweighed by the smooth confidence with which Kentis and Lau tell their goosebumpy little story.

Grade: B+


Tags: , ,

comments
  • narialmy

    this is a great movie festivals .. thanks for the information for the Silent House. Also support us in http://www.fatmasnow.com/2011/07/ipaymucom-pembayaran-online-indonesia/

  • R_zaluski

    Hi! My name is Rosario and I am from Uruguay. I just wanted to add that the original Uruguayan Movie (“La Casa Muda”) actually is inspired by true events that took place around 1940. In a rural house two bodies were found; their tongues had been removed and that’s all we know about the case. The killer was never found and a lot of tales were told about it and by now it’s almost a legend. The movie is inspired but by no means is an actual portrait of what happened. 

  • Indochine

    Thanks for this excellent review Eric. You told me just enough to make me wanna check it out without giving it all away.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ronmoses Ron Moses

    “Elizabeth Olsen, the heretofore-unknown younger sister of Mary-Kate and Ashley…”

    I assume you meant heretofore unknown to you.  You should check out “Martha Marcy May Marlene.” Definitely a superior film to Silent House.

  • http://twitter.com/EricDSnider Eric D. Snider

    This review was originally published after the film premiered at Sundance in 2011.

  • pem

    “strong but still feminine.” I’m sorry…but what does that even mean? Is being strong only attributed to men and something that doesn’t fit with being a woman? That’s news to me.