Logic Problems Presented by 2012
Oliver Platt was right!
A scene from the film "2012" (2009) -
Sony Pictures
2012 wasn't quite apocalyptic at the box office, but it definitely busted down more than a few doors. People came in tidal waves to the movies this past weekend looking to see the world get destroyed in a major way, and boy, did they ever experience that. The facts are these: The visual effects are astounding; audiences may finally take notice of Chiwetel Ejiofor; and after ID4, Godzilla, and The Day After Tomorrow, director Roland Emmerich's disaster fetish has developed a creepy residue. Now, my jaw doesn't often drop -- but my jaw dropped in the first hour of this movie's heinous destruction sequences. Unfortunately, what is a dumb and horrifyingly fun movie in the first hour (and change) turns a little sour in the last hour. This isn't exactly a movie with a lot of brain cells. I understand that. But it couldn't afford to lose any more than it already had. It does. Still, I'm not really mad at 2012. I was able to sit back and appreciate the gloriousness of it. My biggest problem is the handling of America's most cuddly teddy bear, Oliver Platt. Other than John Cusack's character, he is one of the few people in the movie with half a brain. He is portrayed here as a villain. Why? Because he has this psychotic view that the most important thing is to ensure the survival of humanity. The nerve! He has some very tough decisions to make and he doesn't err on the side of niceness when the stakes are so high. There are a couple of people I wanted to kill in this movie and despite his strong performance, it starts with Chiwetel Ejiofor's character. He's a deeply confused human being. He doesn't make sense, even to himself. He raises the alarm bells and tells the White House "we have to move NOW" and evacuate the president. So OK, Platt works with him to begin the evacuation process. But then Ejiofor gets mad at him when Platt refuses to wait for the speaker of the House, whose whereabouts are clear to no one. For those of you who haven't seen the movie, WARNING: SPOILERS. For those same people, this is how the scene played out, with my edits:
I just put myself in Platt's shoes and thought, So let me get this straight. You want to take a very real risk that all of humanity could be wiped out, because you decided 28 minutes before the most historical tsunami impact in the history of civilization ... that we should chance opening the gates to refugees and maybe get everybody in with a minute or two to spare. And we should also assume nothing will go wrong in what has to be the worst case of Murphy's Law in Mayan calendar history. Hey, count me in! Of course, they let the people in and the remnants of humanity survive -- barely. Naturally, Ejiofor is a hero for it. Look, I'm happy it worked out and all that, but my goodness, the human race was mere seconds from annihilation. How awesome would it have been if everyone just gets killed because of his act of "humanity"? Ironic, eh? Yeah, Emmerich doesn't do ironic. Then you have the moron that is Gordon. See, Gordon is the stepdad to Cusack's kids. Cusack, Gordon, Amanda Peet, and the kids know they are doomed if they don't get on a plane to China. Like, they are all very, very, very, very clear on the fact that if they don't hop on a plane to China immediately ... they are all dead. By now they have just barely escaped raining volcanic blasts and earthquakes that leveled all of Pasadena and Yellowstone. To say they were already pushing their luck is the mother of all understatements. So yeah, they need a plane and they need a plane bad. So when the opportunity to, you know, live, arises and a Russian pilot who knows the whereabouts of a plane tells them he can save them but he needs a co-pilot, what does Gordon (who has a some flight lessons under his belt) say? "No! No! I cannot co-pilot. No!"... WHAT??? WHAT??? Now, he said "no" but what I really heard was: "No! Please find another desperate family that wants to live. I'm OK with watching my stepchildren blown to smithereens. I don't love them. I don't love my wife. I don't love my life. I love Satan. I know my only chance at survival depends on me speaking in the affirmative, but I am a diabolical or insanely idiotic person. Either way, KILL ME AND MY FAMILY NOW!" I don't care if my only flight lesson was trying to connect to that cursed fuel plane in Nintendo's Top Gun, when that Russian guy asked me if I can co-pilot, I say freaking yes. Yes. I can do it all. I will fly a Twinkie into Beijing if I have to. I'm that good. Now please direct me to the nearest jumbo jet. We will figure the rest out once we're in the air. I traded text messages with a friend after the movie, mainly focusing on the interesting design concepts behind the arks themselves; here are just a few I received: The overt sexism was great! The whole movie, men privately huddle in their little corners while the women wait to be told what to do and how to do it. Let's hear it for the Y chromosome! And what ship has an engine that won't go based on gates being down? How would you even design that? Just imagine that convo with the builder. "Wait, don't you just want the engines to work no matter what? No? OK, whatever, I'm slave labor." Yeah! Just throw all the money to the billion cameras! Screw the propulsion system!
There's an urban legend that baseball great Wade Boggs once drank 64 beers on a 5 1/2-hour flight across the country. That's like a beer every five minutes. For 330 minutes. Grotesque? Yes. Astonishing? Yes. That's 2012. Now imagine if you're some guy sitting on that same plane as Boggs. You're watching this display, maybe a little offended. He's on his sixth beer! That shouldn't be allowed, not under these circumstances. My God! The outrage! Where's my special beer treatment? As time goes by, however, your anger kind of subsides. Don't you have to, by the -- oh, I don't know -- 20th beer, sit back and appreciate the human disaster taking place in front of you? And by the time Boggs pops open that 40th can of brew, aren't you just outright egging the guy on? Your mind races with the possibilities: When will he vomit? Will his teeth fall out? Will something burst? Will he attack someone? Will it be me? How would I handle him? If something happens can it please happen in the next 40 minutes before we land in LAX? If he survives this flight, will he be carted off the plane like an injured player? Is he on a connecting flight? If so, do I dare buy a ticket? These are the same kind of thoughts I had while watching 2012. I wanted to go down with this ship. It's glorious. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Most Popular Stories
Popular Photo Galleries
Celebrity TattoosMegan Fox, Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp are just a few illustrated stars
Amanda SeyfriedDear John star tops the box office
AskMen.com's Most Desirable Women99 lovely ladies from around the globe
FREE Movie of the Week
Daughters of the DustFilm.com's FREE movie of the week is "Daughters of the Dust." A film that portrays the unique culture of the Gullah people by focusing on the extended Peazant family as its members struggle with the decision to leave their island and move north. On the eve of their departure, memories of their Gullah history and its African roots come rising to the surface. Winner of Cinematography at the 1991 Sundance Film Festival.
movies
television
Terms of Use Privacy Policy RealNetworks
FAQ RSS Mobile SiteMap Blog
Partners
Browse All:
Movies TV Celebrities
Visit other RealNetworks sites: Real.com Rhapsody Rolling Stone GameHouse Evil Beet Celebrity Gossip Advertise
© 2006-2010 RealNetworks. All Rights Reserved.
|